702-623-6362 
Both Nevada and the federal government investigate and prosecute criminal offenses. Sometimes the same conduct can lead to charges under state and federal law. However, there are important differences between these cases, including which agency investigates, who prosecutes the charges, the court procedures involved, and the potential penalties.
If you have been arrested, charged, or placed under investigation for a federal offense in Nevada, obtaining legal advice early can make an important difference. Federal investigations can be extensive, and the decisions you make before or after charges are filed may affect your defense.
At LV Criminal Defense, attorney Nicholas Wooldridge represents clients facing federal criminal allegations in Las Vegas and throughout Nevada. Our firm examines the evidence, explains the legal process, and works with clients to develop defense strategies appropriate to their circumstances.
Call (702) 623-6362 for a free consultation.
On This Page
State criminal offenses are generally established by the Nevada Revised Statutes, while federal offenses are defined by laws contained in the United States Code.
Some activity can violate both sets of laws. Mortgage fraud, for example, may involve Nevada offenses as well as violations of federal fraud statutes, depending on the circumstances.
Nick Wooldridge has a long track record of representing clients accused of serious federal and state crimes in Nevada.
Three differences are especially important.
1. Federal Criminal Penalties
While many federal crimes can result in lengthy prison sentences, some of which require mandatory minimums, federal penalties will not always be harsher than those imposed under Nevada law. The length of a sentence is based upon the crime charged, the applicable statute(s), the defendant’s prior criminal record and any other factors that are legally relevant.
A federal prison sentence is served in the federal correctional system. The location of the prison where a defendant serves his/her sentence is determined through the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ designation process and not solely by where the prosecution took place.
2. Federal Investigating Agencies
When I initially met with Mr. Wooldridge, he took the opportunity to sit and go over my problem with me. He described details in my case which he found disturbing and explained why he I should have him on my side.
Federal investigations may be conducted by various agencies including the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration, IRS Criminal Investigation, Homeland Security Investigations, or any other agency that has jurisdiction over the suspected offense.
In addition to collecting large amounts of documents, performing financial analyses, gathering electronic evidence, etc., federal investigations often require cooperation among several law enforcement agencies.
3. Federal Courts and Prosecutors
Federal criminal cases in Nevada are typically prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys and are heard in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada handles federal prosecutions arising from investigations conducted by federal law enforcement agencies.
Understanding these differences is essential when preparing a defense. A federal case is not simply a Nevada criminal case heard in a different courthouse.
Numerous offenses occurring in Nevada may be prosecuted under federal law. Whether federal charges are appropriate depends on the specific statute and the facts supporting federal jurisdiction.
Examples include:
Federal investigations may also involve extortion and false billing claims.
The prosecution must establish the elements of the particular offense charged. Being associated with an investigation or accused of wrongdoing does not mean the government can prove a criminal case.
If you are being investigated or have already been charged, Nicholas Wooldridge can review the allegations and discuss your available options.
A federal criminal investigation may begin long before an arrest or indictment.
Agents may ask to interview you, request business documents, contact your employees, or seek financial and electronic records. You might also receive a subpoena or a letter indicating that prosecutors are investigating possible federal offenses.
You should not assume that speaking voluntarily with investigators will resolve the matter.
Before agreeing to an interview, consider consulting a federal criminal defense attorney. Counsel can help determine whether the interview is voluntary, what legal obligations you have, and how your statements could affect the investigation.
A grand jury subpoena requires particular attention. Depending on its terms, it may compel testimony or the production of specified records. It should not be ignored.
Some people receive a target letter indicating that prosecutors consider them potential defendants. Others may be identified as subjects or witnesses.
The Department of Justice’s guidance on grand jury investigations explains these distinctions and the procedures surrounding subpoenas and target notifications.
Receiving a target letter does not mean that an indictment is inevitable. Conversely, the absence of a target letter does not mean that an investigation has ended.
Early representation may allow an attorney to evaluate the allegations, address legal issues involving subpoenas, and communicate with prosecutors when appropriate.
Preserve relevant documents and communications. Do not alter records, delete evidence, or attempt to influence witness testimony.
Federal criminal penalties depend on the particular offense, the applicable statutory sentencing range, the defendant’s criminal history, and other relevant circumstances.
Depending on the charge, a sentence may involve:
Some federal offenses carry mandatory minimum prison terms. These requirements may limit the sentencing court’s discretion unless a statutory exception applies.
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines provide a framework for evaluating offense seriousness, criminal history, and other sentencing factors.
The guidelines are advisory rather than mandatory. Nevertheless, federal judges must properly calculate and consider the applicable guideline range before determining a lawful sentence.
Judges also consider statutory sentencing factors and may impose a sentence outside the guideline range when legally justified.
The United States Sentencing Commission publishes the guidelines and related sentencing materials.
A defense attorney can examine guideline calculations, challenge unsupported assertions, and present information relevant to sentencing.
The federal sentencing judge does not generally select the prison where a defendant will serve a sentence.
The Bureau of Prisons determines placement based on classification, security requirements, medical needs, program availability, and other factors.
Its official facility designation guidance explains how these decisions are made.
A federal prosecution in Nevada does not guarantee placement in any particular facility.
Many federal criminal cases are resolved through negotiated plea agreements rather than trial.
Depending on the circumstances, an agreement may involve dismissal of certain charges, sentencing recommendations, stipulated facts, or other conditions.
However, entering a plea agreement can have consequences beyond the sentence itself.
A defendant may be required to waive important rights, potentially including some rights to appeal. The agreement may also address restitution, forfeiture, or cooperation with federal authorities.
Before accepting a plea agreement, it is important to understand what the government is offering and what obligations the defendant would assume.
The court is not necessarily bound by every sentencing recommendation contained in an agreement.
A federal criminal defense attorney can review proposed terms, explain the potential consequences, and help a client make an informed decision.
Not every case should be resolved through a plea agreement. Whether negotiation or trial is appropriate depends on the evidence, legal issues, and client’s objectives.
Federal prosecutors must prove every required element of a criminal offense beyond a reasonable doubt.
As in Nevada state criminal proceedings, defendants may challenge the government’s evidence and raise defenses supported by the facts and applicable law.
Potential defense issues include:
Improper investigation procedures
Federal investigators must comply with constitutional requirements governing searches, seizures, and other investigative activity.
If evidence was obtained through an unlawful search or seizure, defense counsel may seek to exclude it when the law permits.
The suppression of evidence can weaken the prosecution’s case, although it does not automatically guarantee dismissal.
Violations involving Miranda rights
Federal agents must comply with the constitutional rules governing custodial interrogation.
Miranda warnings are generally required before custodial questioning, not automatically at the moment of every arrest.
If statements were obtained in violation of these rules, a defense attorney may seek to prevent their use in court where the law provides that remedy.
Insufficient evidence
A federal indictment is an accusation, not proof of guilt.
The prosecution must establish the necessary elements of the offense. A case may involve disputes about criminal intent, knowledge, identity, participation, or the reliability of particular evidence.
Self-defense
Self-defense can be considered in some federal criminal cases where there are allegations of violence; however, its use will depend on both the type of crime charged and the facts surrounding the incident (i.e., what kind of threat was perceived and how much force was employed).
Entrapment
Many federal investigations utilize undercover officers or confidential informants.
Under very limited conditions, an entrapment defense may be available if all of the necessary legal elements are met. Simply giving someone the opportunity to commit a crime does not typically rise to the level of entrapment.
Insanity
While federal law allows for an insanity defense in certain situations, this defense has very strict legal requirements.
If a jury finds a defendant not guilty by reason of insanity, the defendant will likely go through commitment proceedings governed by federal law rather than being released as usual.
Other defenses
Depending on the case, additional defenses may involve mistaken identity, an alibi, unreliable witness testimony, flawed forensic analysis, or other factual and legal issues.
The most effective approach depends on the charges and the evidence. Nicholas Wooldridge and LV Criminal Defense can review the circumstances of a federal investigation or prosecution to identify potentially applicable defenses.
United States District Court — District of Nevada
Lloyd D. George U.S. Courthouse
333 S. Las Vegas Boulevard
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Official court website: U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
Federal Bureau of Investigation — Las Vegas
Information about federal investigations and the local FBI field office is available through the FBI’s official website.
For an overview of criminal proceedings, the United States Courts’ guide to federal criminal cases explains initial appearances, arraignments, trials, plea agreements, and sentencing.
5 Star 735 reviewsA federal investigation or criminal charge can affect much more than the immediate court proceedings.
Potential consequences may extend to employment, finances, professional licenses, immigration matters, family obligations, and future opportunities.
The federal criminal justice system has procedures and sentencing rules that differ from those used in Nevada courts. Having counsel familiar with those distinctions is important when evaluating how to respond.
At LV Criminal Defense, attorney Nicholas Wooldridge represents individuals accused of federal crimes in Las Vegas and throughout Nevada.
Whether you have been contacted by investigators, received a subpoena, or are already facing charges, our firm can discuss the allegations, review the available information, and explain the next steps.
Call (702) 623-6362 — Available 24/7 — Get a Free Consultation
An early discussion can help you better understand the federal process and begin considering the available options for your defense.
Federal Criminal Attorney in Las Vegas, Nevada