702-623-6362 
The following are examples of past criminal cases where we have provided representation. Feel free to browse our case results to learn about the types of past cases that our Nevada criminal defense lawyers have handled. Every case is different and you need to have your own case evaluated by an experienced attorney who can provide advice specific to your situation.
Nick Wooldridge successfully defended G.G. against first-degree murder charges in a complex case spanning over four years of litigation. Despite serious allegations from a 2005 workplace incident where G.G’s boss Danny Cates was found shot dead, our legal team built a compelling defense strategy. Through persistent advocacy and thorough preparation, we achieved complete dismissal of all murder charges in 2023. This outcome demonstrates our ability to secure favorable results in the most challenging criminal cases.
In January 2025, E.A. was charged with DUI, speeding, and reckless driving (misdemeanors).
(No resolution was provided in the source record.)
In January 2025, D.W. was charged with domestic battery with a deadly weapon, carrying a concealed firearm without a permit, and domestic battery. All charges were dismissed, clearing the record completely.
In January 2025, V.D. was charged with Theft valued under $1200 and Conspiracy to Use a Credit or Debit Card or Identifying Information without consent, classified as a Gross Misdemeanor. Following court proceedings, both charges were dismissed, resulting in no criminal record for V.D. and allowing them to move forward without further legal consequences.
In January 2025, T.L. faced serious charges including Battery Constituting Domestic Violence with Substantial Bodily Harm, Assault, and Domestic Battery (first offense). The case underwent full legal review and was ultimately resolved to Simple Assault, ensuring accountability while avoiding harsher felony penalties.
In January 2025, M.W. was charged with Stalking (first offense), which carried potential misdemeanor consequences. After a careful legal process, the court dismissed the case, clearing M.W. of all charges.
In February 2025, C.C. was charged with Possession of Visual Pornography of a Person Under 16 (first offense, Felony). The court ultimately imposed probation, providing oversight while allowing C.C. to avoid incarceration.
In February 2025, F.V. faced multiple charges, including Domestic Battery (first offense), Battery by Strangulation, and Battery. After review, the case was resolved to Disorderly Conduct, ensuring some legal accountability while avoiding felony sentencing.
In February 2025, B.N. was charged with Disorderly Conduct and Battery. After legal proceedings, the charges were dismissed, leaving B.N. without a criminal record and no further obligations to the court.
In February 2025, J.B. faced three counts of Battery, each considered a misdemeanor. Following the court process, all charges were dismissed, concluding the matter without penalties.
In February 2025, C.N. was charged with Coercion Constituting Domestic Violence involving threat or use of physical force. The legal review resulted in dismissal of the charge, allowing C.N. to avoid legal consequences.
In February 2025, R.C. was charged with Resisting a Public Officer, a misdemeanor offense. The case was dismissed during the court process, leaving R.C. free from any criminal record.
In March 2025, I.T. faced three counts of Possession of Visual Pornography of a Person Under 16 (first offense). The court imposed probation, providing oversight and accountability while avoiding incarceration.
In March 2025, S.P. was charged with Duty to Stop at the Scene of an Accident Involving Vehicle or Property and Failure to Provide Information. After evaluation, the case was dismissed, and S.P. faced no further legal consequences.
In March 2025, R.R. faced charges of Sexual Assault against a Child under 14 and multiple counts of Lewdness with a Child under 14 (first offense). Following legal proceedings, the charges were ultimately resolved to Conspiracy to Commit a Crime (Gross Misdemeanor), providing a formal resolution while avoiding harsher felony penalties.
In March 2025, C.H. was charged with Battery on a Protected Person (Gross Misdemeanor). The court dismissed the case, clearing C.H. of all charges.
In 2025, J.T.A. was charged with Felony Theft. Prior to trial, the State offered to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor if a bench trial was accepted. J.T.A. insisted on a jury trial, and days before the trial commenced, the State dismissed the case entirely.
In March 2025, G.M. faced charges of Domestic Battery (first offense). After legal proceedings, the case was dismissed, allowing G.M. to avoid penalties or further court involvement.
In April 2025, J.T. was charged with Luring Children or Mentally Ill Persons Using Technology with Harmful Materials (Felony). The charge was resolved to a Gross Misdemeanor, ensuring legal accountability while limiting potential consequences.
In April 2025, B.S. faced charges of Driving Without a Valid License and failing to provide proof of insurance. The case was dismissed, leaving B.S. without a criminal record.
In April 2025, D.Z. was charged with DUI involving alcohol or controlled substances (first offense). The court resolved the matter to Reckless Driving, providing a lesser misdemeanor penalty.
In April 2025, D.B. faced multiple serious felony charges, including Open Murder with a Deadly Weapon, Conspiracy to Commit Robbery, Robbery with a Deadly Weapon, and Accessory to Commit Murder. The legal proceedings resulted in Probation, balancing oversight with rehabilitation.
In April 2025, J.M.-L. faced multiple charges of Child Sexual Abuse, Lewdness with a Child under 14 (first offense), Sexual Assault against a Child, and Kidnapping of a Minor (first degree). The case was resolved to Probation for Attempted Lewdness with a Child under 14, ensuring accountability and supervision.
In May 2025, A.F. faced charges including multiple counts of Lewdness with a Child under 14 (first offense) and Sexual Assault against a Child. The court resolved the matter with probation, providing monitoring while avoiding incarceration.
In May 2025, C.R. was charged with Attempted Theft exceeding $3500 (Felony). The case was resolved to a misdemeanor, reducing the severity of the legal outcome.
In May 2025, J.B. faced multiple charges including Burglary of a Business (first offense), Theft valued between $1200–$5000, Forgery, and Possession of a Schedule I or II Controlled Substance. The court imposed probation, ensuring legal accountability.
In May 2025, B.B. was charged with Sexual Assault. Following a motion to dismiss for prejudicial pretrial delay, the court granted the motion and dismissed the case entirely.
In May 2025, R.B. faced multiple charges of Lewdness with a Child under 14 and Sexual Assault against a Child. The case resulted in probation, providing oversight while avoiding harsher consequences.
In May 2025, A.U. was charged with Lewdness with a Child under 14 (first offense). The court imposed probation.
In June 2025, J.H. faced charges of Sexual Assault, Attempted Sexual Assault, and First-Degree Kidnapping. The case was dismissed, clearing J.H. of all charges.
In June 2025, N.G. was charged with Domestic Battery involving a Deadly Weapon. The case was dismissed.
In June 2025, J.M. was charged with Harassment and Noise Disturbance. Following legal proceedings, the case was dismissed.
In July 2025, M.H. was charged with Battery. The case was dismissed.
In July 2025, S.G. faced charges of Obstructing or Providing False Information to a Police Officer and Domestic Battery (first offense). The court dismissed all charges.
In July 2025, Z.C. faced charges of Preparing, Advertising, or Distributing Material Depicting Pornography Involving a Minor, and Lewdness with a Child under 14. The case concluded with probation.
In August 2025, D.S. was charged with Domestic Battery by Strangulation. The case was dismissed.
In August 2025, S.L. faced charges of Open or Gross Lewdness (first offense). The case was dismissed.
In September 2025, K.W. was charged with DUI involving Drugs, Chemicals, or Organic Solvents. The court resolved the matter to Reckless Driving, a lesser misdemeanor penalty.
In September 2025, B.N. faced multiple charges of Lewdness with a Child under 14 and Sexual Assault. The case was resolved to probation, including a plea to Residential Burglary (Felony).
In September 2025, J.L. was charged with Battery and Domestic Violence (Misdemeanor). The court dismissed the charges.
Client charged with a violent offense. After the trial, the client was found NOT guilty.
Client charged with counts of Sexual assault and lewdness with a minor under 14. After the preliminary hearing and cross-examination of the accuser, as well as the Detective matter resolved to Probation with a drop-down to a gross misdemeanor non-sex offense.
In January 2024, G.B. was charged with making a False Statement to Obtain Public Office. The case was dismissed by the court, and no further action was taken.
In January 2024, C.S. faced a Gross Misdemeanor charge for Pandering. The case was dismissed, clearing the client of all allegations.
In January 2024, A.A. was charged with Theft and Embezzlement. The case was reduced to a Gross Misdemeanor and resolved to Probation.
In January 2024, A.R.P. was charged with Domestic Violence involving the use of a deadly weapon. The case was dismissed by the prosecution due to a lack of evidence.
In January 2024, N.C. faced a misdemeanor charge for Domestic Violence in the presence of a child. The case was dismissed, and no penalties were imposed.
In January 2024, P.S. faced two misdemeanor counts of Domestic Battery. Both were dismissed, and the matter was closed.
In January 2024, M.A. was charged with Battery and two counts of Providing False Information to a Police Officer. All charges were dismissed by the court.
In January 2024, S.P. was charged with Domestic Violence by Strangulation. The case was dismissed, and the client was cleared of all charges.
In February 2024, O.Z. faced two misdemeanor counts of Domestic Violence. Both charges were dismissed after review by the court.
In February 2024, T.A. faced two felony counts of Pandering. The case was resolved to Misdemeanor Trespass and closed with no felony record.
In March 2024, A.M. was charged with misdemeanor Domestic Violence and felony Coercion Constituting Domestic Violence. The case was dismissed, ending all proceedings.
In March 2024, R.J. faced a misdemeanor Battery charge. The case was dismissed, and no conviction was recorded.
In March 2024, K.W. was charged with First-Degree Burglary of a Business and Grand Larceny over $5,000. The case was resolved to Probation following successful negotiation.
In March 2024, E.K. faced a misdemeanor Battery charge. The case was dismissed, and the record remained clean.
In 2024, T.A. was charged with multiple counts of Sexual Assault of a Minor under 14. After jury selection, the prosecution offered a resolution to Probation, which was accepted.
In April 2024, A.D. was charged with Possession of Child Pornography and Possession of Visual Depictions Involving Sexual Conduct of a Child. The case was resolved to Probation, avoiding imprisonment.
In April 2024, J.A. was formally charged with two counts of First-Degree Domestic Violence, classified as misdemeanors, and an additional felony charge of Domestic Violence by Strangulation. The court proceedings concluded with the case being resolved through Probation, allowing J.A. to avoid incarceration while complying with court-mandated conditions.
In April 2024, W.C. faced a serious felony charge of Battery with a Deadly Weapon that resulted in Substantial Bodily Harm to the victim. Following the legal process, the case was ultimately resolved to Probation, ensuring oversight without a prison sentence.
In May 2024, G.B. was charged with committing a Fraudulent Act in Gaming, a Gross Misdemeanor, alongside a Theft charge categorized as a Misdemeanor. Both charges were dismissed during court proceedings, resulting in no criminal record for G.B.
In May 2024, D.C. faced a misdemeanor Battery charge. The legal proceedings concluded with the case being dismissed, meaning no further action was required against D.C.
In May 2024, M.C. was charged with Domestic Violence by Strangulation, a serious felony offense. The case was dismissed, resulting in no further legal consequences for M.C.
In May 2024, A.A. faced multiple felony charges, including Trafficking Marijuana (50–100 lbs) and Sale/Transport of Schedule I or II Controlled Substances. After legal review, the case was resolved to Probation, avoiding incarceration but requiring compliance with strict court conditions.
In May 2024, M.A. was charged with First-Offense DUI and Reckless Driving. The case progressed through the court system with outcomes reflecting the standard legal approach for first-time offenders.
In May 2024, J.C. faced charges of Indecent or Obscene Exposure and Open or Gross Lewdness, both classified as Gross Misdemeanors. The case was resolved as a misdemeanor, with no requirement for registry or additional reporting.
In May 2024, P.T. was charged with Embezzlement under $1,200, a misdemeanor offense. The case was dismissed, resulting in no criminal liability.
In May 2024, M.A. faced another misdemeanor Battery charge. Legal proceedings concluded with the case being dismissed.
In May 2024, Temporary Protective Orders issued to H.G. were formally dissolved, concluding the matter legally.
In June 2024, J.T. was granted a Governor’s Pardon, officially restoring rights and relieving the individual from previous legal consequences.
In June 2024, F.L. was charged with two felony counts of Lewdness with a Child Under 14. The case was resolved to Probation, allowing F.L. to avoid prison while being subject to court supervision.
In June 2024, H.J. faced multiple felony charges, including Assault with a Deadly Weapon, Discharging a Firearm into a Structure, and Possession of a Firearm by a Prohibited Person. The court granted Probation, providing oversight without incarceration.
In June 2024, L.D. was charged with Domestic Violence by Strangulation, a felony offense. The case was dismissed, ending legal proceedings without further consequence.
In June 2024, L.S. was charged with First-Offense DUI (Misdemeanor). The court resolved the case to lesser traffic violations, including Failure to Obey Traffic Signals and Reckless Driving.
In June 2024, S.C. faced a First-Offense DUI charge (Misdemeanor). The case was resolved as Reckless Driving (Misdemeanor), reducing the severity of legal consequences.
In July 2024, H.Y. was charged with multiple felony counts, including Soliciting a Child for Prostitution and using a Computer to Lure a Minor. After court proceedings, the charges were resolved to a lesser offense of Loitering Where Children May Be Endangered (Gross Misdemeanor).
In July 2024, H.M. faced multiple charges, including Destruction of Evidence, Duty to Stop at the Scene of an Accident, and Reckless Driving, some classified as felonies. Despite the prosecution seeking incarceration, the court granted Probation.
In July 2024, T.E. was charged with First-Offense DUI and Failure to Maintain Lane. The case was reduced to Reckless Driving (Misdemeanor).
In July 2024, C.J. faced felony charges of Battery Causing Substantial Bodily Harm and Battery by Strangulation. The court ultimately resolved the matter as a misdemeanor Battery charge.
In July 2024, C.W. was charged with First-Offense Domestic Violence (Misdemeanor). The case was dismissed, concluding legal proceedings.
In July 2024, M.T. faced misdemeanor charges for participating in a Speed Contest and Reckless Driving. The case was dismissed.
In August 2024, A.A. was charged with First-Offense Domestic Violence (Misdemeanor). The case was dismissed without further legal action.
In August 2024, S.N. faced a misdemeanor Battery Domestic Violence charge. The case was dismissed.
In August 2024, L.A. was charged with Battery Causing Substantial Bodily Harm (Felony). The case was resolved to a misdemeanor Battery charge.
In August 2024, S.M. faced a misdemeanor Battery charge. The case was dismissed.
In August 2024, M.L. was charged with First-Offense Domestic Violence (Misdemeanor). The case was dismissed.
In August 2024, G.J. faced a misdemeanor Battery Domestic Violence charge. The case was dismissed.
In August 2024, M.T. was charged with Destruction of Property valued between $250 and $5,000 (Gross Misdemeanor). The prosecution denied further action, ending the case without penalties.
In August 2024, I.D. was charged with battery constituting domestic violence (misdemeanor), involving allegations of physical harm to a family member. After review of the evidence and legal negotiations, the case was dismissed, clearing him of all charges.
In August 2024, A.P. was charged with possession to sell Schedule I and II substances (felony), which could have led to significant prison time. Through effective case handling, the charges were reduced and resolved to a misdemeanor.
In September 2024, Q.Z. faced charges of first-degree burglary, theft of property valued between $650 and $3,500, and forgery with intent to defraud (felonies). The legal team successfully negotiated the case, resulting in all charges being resolved as misdemeanors.
In September 2024, S.L. was charged with perjury and bigamy (felonies), facing serious penalties if convicted. After court proceedings, the case was resolved to probation and ultimately reduced to a gross misdemeanor.
In September 2024, T.B. was charged with multiple traffic violations, including disregarding police orders, reckless driving, and disorderly conduct.
(No resolution was provided in the source record.)
In September 2024, C.P. was charged with domestic violence by strangulation (felony), a severe allegation that could carry significant prison time. Through legal advocacy, the charge was reduced and resolved to a misdemeanor.
In September 2024, J.C. faced a misdemeanor battery charge following an incident of physical altercation. The case was dismissed, resulting in no conviction and full clearance of charges.
In September 2024, J.D. was charged with domestic violence, first offense (misdemeanor), related to an alleged household dispute. The case was dismissed after review, and no further legal action was required.
In September 2024, B.A. was charged with reckless driving causing death and substantial bodily harm, serious felonies with potential long-term consequences. After a jury trial, he was acquitted of all charges, resulting in full exoneration.
In October 2024, A.F. faced 12 felony charges related to drug trafficking, each carrying severe penalties. After legal proceedings, the case was ultimately resolved to possession of drugs not subject to interstate commerce, a misdemeanor.
In October 2024, A.A. was charged with 51 counts of forgery and theft valued between $25,000 and $100,000 (felonies). The legal resolution included probation and a reduction of charges to a gross misdemeanor.
In October 2024, S.C. was charged with drawing a deadly weapon in a threatening manner and battery (misdemeanors), involving an altercation with another individual. Both charges were dismissed, removing all legal liability.
O.C. was charged with multiple counts of lewdness with a child under 14, which carried felony-level penalties. After voir dire and negotiation, the case was resolved to a fictitious plea with probation.
In October 2024, M.Q. and A.B. were each charged with battery and drawing a deadly weapon in a threatening manner (misdemeanors). All charges were dismissed, resulting in no conviction for either individual.
In October 2024, A.C. was charged with battery (misdemeanor) following an alleged altercation. The case was dismissed, and the charges were cleared from the record.
In October 2024, T.B. was charged with burglary, home invasion, and domestic battery (felony and misdemeanor charges). The case was dismissed, fully clearing all allegations.
In October 2024, V.R. was charged with lewdness with a child aged 14–15 and sexual assault against a child under 16 (felonies). The case was resolved with probation, focusing on child abuse prevention measures.
In October 2024, M.I. faced a misdemeanor battery charge following a minor physical incident. The case was dismissed, leaving the record clean.
In November 2024, K.O. was charged with robbery and two counts of domestic violence with intent to commit robbery (felonies). The case was dismissed, removing all legal liability.
In November 2024, J.B. faced charges for passing a check with intent to defraud and theft under $1,200 (misdemeanors). Both charges were dismissed, fully clearing the individual.
In December 2024, G.L. was charged with conspiracy to commit robbery and robbery with a deadly weapon (felonies). The charges were negotiated down to two misdemeanors.
In December 2024, F.P. faced domestic battery, coercion, and vehicle burglary charges (felonies and misdemeanors). The case was resolved as disorderly conduct.
In December 2024, A.E. was charged with resisting a public officer with a firearm and battery on a protected person (felony and gross misdemeanor). The case was resolved as a gross misdemeanor with probation.
In December 2024, A.B. was charged with open or gross lewdness (registerable offense, gross misdemeanor). The matter was resolved as a misdemeanor with no registration requirement.
In December 2024, F.Pa. was charged with open or gross lewdness, first offense (gross misdemeanor).
The case was dismissed, clearing the record.
In December 2024, D.B. was charged with battery on a protected person and open/gross lewdness (gross misdemeanors). The charges were dismissed, leaving no conviction.
In December 2024, E.L. was federally charged with interference with flight crew members (felony).
The federal case was resolved as a misdemeanor.
In December 2024, R.M. was charged with domestic battery by strangulation and domestic battery, first offense (felony and misdemeanor). The case was dismissed, fully clearing all allegations.
The client is charged with two counts of reckless driving, causing death, and one count of reckless driving causing substantial bodily harm. Client facing potential felony convictions and substantial prison time, as well as potential loss of professional license. The case and alleged victims resided in a small rural town, where the trial took place. We focus-grouped the case and figured out how to win. After a five-day jury trial client was NOT GUILTY of the charge offenses.
Client charged with multiple accounts of lewdness with a minor under the age of 14. Charges carry a minimum term of 10 years to life imprisonment. The case lasted for many years, and we were able to obtain body cam footage from a prior incident of the alleged victim, who made inconsistent statements. Matter proceeded to trial. After five days of jury selection prosecutor offered probation with a non-sex fictitious plea to vagrancy.
Client charged with multiple counts of sexual assault as well as lewdness with a minor under 14 years of age. The case lasted many years. The case proceeded to jury trial. After three days of jury selection makes an offer to Probation.
Client charged with felonies related to alleged assaults on an airplane. After consistent preparation as well as designation of a potential expert for not guilty by reason of insanity, the defense matter was reduced to a petty offense, misdemeanor.
Federal case. Client charged with threats against Secret Service protectives as well as interstate communications with a threat to injure. The client is facing several years of imprisonment. Lengthy and bifurcated sentencing hearing. Client receives probation.
In January 2023, L.P. faced a misdemeanor charge for soliciting or engaging in prostitution. After legal proceedings, the case was thoroughly reviewed and ultimately dismissed, resulting in no conviction.
In January 2023, J.W. was initially charged with aggravated stalking. After legal review, the charge was reduced to misdemeanor disorderly conduct, and the matter was resolved accordingly.
In January 2023, H.M. was accused of misdemeanor battery. The case went through the legal process and was ultimately dismissed, clearing her of all charges.
In January 2023, D.W. was charged with felony statutory sexual seduction, a registerable sex offense. After legal proceedings, the case was resolved to child neglect and endangerment, classified as a gross misdemeanor.
In January 2023, S.R. faced a gross misdemeanor charge for luring a child or mentally ill person. Following review and negotiation, the matter was reduced to a misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct.
In January 2023, C.S. was charged with domestic battery, first offense. After review of the evidence, the case was dismissed in its entirety.
In January 2023, B.B. faced a gross misdemeanor charge for discharging a firearm where a person might be endangered. The case was resolved as a simple misdemeanor with the completion of required classes.
In January 2023, H.N. was charged with felony theft and issuing a non-sufficient funds check. The case was later dismissed, and the record was sealed.
In January 2023, K.J. was charged with felony sexual assault and indecent exposure. After legal proceedings and negotiations, the case was ultimately resolved by coercion, categorized as a non-sexual and non-registerable offense. This outcome significantly reduced the severity of the original charges and avoided any long-term registry implications.
In March 2023, S.A. faced a felony theft charge involving property valued between $5,000 and $25,000. Following discussions and review of evidence, the charge was reduced and resolved as a gross misdemeanor, allowing the client to avoid a felony conviction on record.
In March 2023, N.M. was charged with domestic battery, first offense. Upon review by the prosecution, the case was denied for prosecution, resulting in no further legal action or criminal record against the client.
In March 2023, N.F. was initially charged with open or gross lewdness, classified as a registerable sex offense. After careful case handling, the matter was resolved as a misdemeanor battery, removing any requirement for sex offender registration and reducing long-term consequences.
In March 2023, T.J. faced a misdemeanor domestic battery charge for a first offense. The case was later resolved to disturbing the peace, a lesser charge, which resulted in a more favorable outcome and minimized potential penalties.
In March 2023, H.C. was charged with multiple serious felonies, including two counts of sexual assault, attempted sexual assault, coercion (sexually motivated), and three counts of domestic battery. After extensive legal efforts, the case was ultimately resolved to open and gross lewdness, avoiding more severe felony convictions.
In April 2023, J.P. faced four felony counts of theft involving property valued over $3,500, along with a conspiracy to commit theft charge. Through legal negotiation, the case was reduced and resolved as a gross misdemeanor, helping the client avoid a felony record.
In April 2023, T.D. was charged with misdemeanor battery. After the case review, the charge was dismissed, resulting in no conviction or further proceedings.
In April 2023, T.H. was also charged with misdemeanor battery. The case was dismissed after review, clearing the client of all charges
In April 2023, I.E. faced charges for both misdemeanor battery and domestic battery. Upon further assessment, both charges were dismissed, and the client was fully cleared of all allegations.
In May 2023, S.G. was charged with misdemeanor battery. The case was reviewed and later dismissed, leaving the client without any conviction or penalty.
In May 2023, M.F. was charged with robbery involving the use of a deadly weapon, a serious felony offense. After successful case handling and negotiations, the charge was resolved to a misdemeanor, substantially lowering the potential penalties.
In May 2023, T.L. was charged with grand larceny of property valued between $5,000 and $25,000, conspiracy to buy or possess stolen property, and possession of stolen property under $25,000. The case was ultimately dismissed, resulting in a complete clearance of all charges.
In May 2023, T.L. faced a separate charge of domestic battery, first offense. The prosecution denied the case, leading to no trial or conviction.
In May 2023, M.M. was charged with possession of a Schedule I or II controlled substance (Flunitrazepam). After review, the prosecution denied the case, and no criminal proceedings continued against the client.
In June 2023, D.N. was charged with DUI Drugs (M) and Basic Speeding 21–20 (M). After the case review, the DUI Drugs charge was dismissed by the prosecution. No further legal action was taken, and the client maintained a clean record.
In June 2023, B.S. faced multiple charges, including Battery DV SBH (F), Coercion DV (F), and Battery DV (M). Following negotiations, the Battery SBH charge was dismissed in court. The client avoided a felony conviction, and no penalties were imposed.
In June 2023, N.T. was charged with a misdemeanor Battery offense. The court reviewed the case and found insufficient grounds to proceed. All charges were dismissed, resulting in a favorable outcome for the client.
In June 2023, J.H. faced one count of Battery (M) following a domestic dispute. After the investigation, the prosecution moved to dismiss the case. No further proceedings occurred, and the case was formally closed.
In June 2023, R.G. was charged with Solicitation of a Child for Prostitution (F) and Luring for a Sexual Act (F). After legal intervention, the case was reduced to a gross misdemeanor. The resolution avoided a felony conviction and potential incarceration.
In June 2023, J.B. faced charges for Stalking with Use of the Internet (F). The case was re-evaluated and resolved as Conspiracy to Commit a Crime (GM). This resulted in a lesser charge and a more favorable legal outcome.
In July 2023, D.D. was accused of using another person’s information without consent. The defense demonstrated a lack of sufficient evidence in court. The case was ultimately dismissed, and the client was cleared of all charges.
In August 2023, R.O. faced two misdemeanor Battery charges. After a full review, both charges were dismissed by the prosecution. The client faced no penalties, and the matter was closed.
In August 2023, S.H. was charged with Lewdness involving a child under 14, a serious felony offense. After the investigation, the case was dismissed due to a lack of supporting evidence. The client was fully exonerated and cleared of all allegations.
In August 2023, L.L. faced a misdemeanor charge for Solicitation of Prostitution. Upon review, the court determined dismissal was appropriate. The case was closed with no further action or record of conviction.
In September 2023, T.D. was charged with three counts of Attempted Murder with a Deadly Weapon Enhancement and two counts of Assault with a Deadly Weapon. The case was ultimately resolved to Discharging a Weapon Where a Person Might Be Endangered, a Gross Misdemeanor.
In September 2023, S.M. was granted a Governor’s Pardon on multiple cases. The client received full relief through the pardon process, and all prior matters were cleared.
In September 2023, R.R. was charged with Obtaining or Using Personal ID of an Older or Vulnerable Person, Theft over $3,500, and two counts of Forgery. The case was resolved to Probation, allowing the client to avoid incarceration.
In September 2023, V.N. faced multiple felony charges, including Conspiracy to Violate the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, Trafficking of Schedule I or II substances, and Possession with Intent to Sell. After negotiations, the case was resolved to Probation.
In October 2023, J.F. was charged with Theft exceeding $500,000. The case was successfully resolved to Probation, sparing the client from prison time.
In October 2023, F.H. was charged with Trafficking Schedule I Controlled Substances, Conspiracy to Violate the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, and Transportation of a Controlled Substance. The case was resolved to Probation after review.
In October 2023, T.H. faced a misdemeanor Battery charge. The case was dismissed by the prosecution, and the matter was closed.
In October 2023, B.L. was charged with multiple felonies, including Assault with a Deadly Weapon, Assault Constituting Domestic Violence with a Deadly Weapon, Coercion with Force, Burglary with a Firearm, and Second-Degree Kidnapping. The case was resolved to a Gross Misdemeanor with Probation.
In November 2023, E.F. was charged with First-Degree Grand Larceny and First-Degree Residential Burglary. After negotiation, the case was resolved to Probation.
In November 2023, I.G.C. was charged with Coercion Constituting Domestic Violence and Battery Domestic Violence on a Pregnant Victim. Both charges were dismissed, and the client faced no penalties.
In November 2023, I.H. faced misdemeanor charges for Disturbing the Peace and Battery. Both were dismissed by the court following review.
In November 2023, J.N. was charged with misdemeanor Battery Domestic Violence. The case was dismissed, and the record remained clear.
In December 2023, D.J. was charged with 22 counts of Preparing, Advertising, or Distributing Pornography Involving a Minor and Possession of Child Pornography under 16. The case was resolved to Probation after successful defense efforts.
In December 2023, J.H. was charged with Performing Surgery Without a License, Acting as a Medical Practitioner Without a License, and Disregarding Safety, resulting in Substantial Bodily Harm. The case was resolved to Probation, avoiding prison time.
Client charged with multiple counts of sexual assault and a minor under 14 years old, as well as lewdness with a minor under 14 years old. The case lasted over five years. When a trial-imminent matter is resolved to Probation with a drop-down to a non-sex gross misdemeanor.
Client charged with sexual assault of a minor. Destroyed the complaining witness at the preliminary hearing. The state got very reasonable, and the matter was resolved to probation and with a misdemeanor at the end of probation.
Client charged with multiple counts of sexual assault. At the end of jury selection, the state made an offer to probation.
Client charged with multiple counts of sexual assault and lewdness with a minor under 14. 2 accusers in one trial. The client is facing life imprisonment. After jury trial, Found Not Guilty on all 12 Counts.
Client charged with multiple counts of Lewdness and a count of sexual assault of a minor under 14. The client is facing life imprisonment. The jury trial found not guilty of all counts.
Client charged with murder. After years of litigation, the State agrees to dismiss the case.
Client charged with Murder and Robbery with use of a deadly weapon. Result = probation and, if successful to a misdemeanor.
Client indicted for theft of over $800,000 after years of litigation…client receives probation and the restitution amount is reduced significantly.
Hotel business owner charged with sexual assault of employee. Destroyed the complaining witness at the preliminary hearing. Matter resolved to probation and no sex offender registration.
Client charged with sexual assault and kidnapping. After the preliminary hearing kidnapping charge was dismissed. Destroyed alleged victim was at the preliminary. Matter resolved to probation, no registration, and if successful on probation, reduced to a misdemeanor.
Client charged with multiple counts of sexual assault and lewdness with a minor under 14. After years of litigation….matter was resolved to probation, and if successful, drop down to a gross misdemeanor and no registration.
Client is on probation and is alleged to have violated for picking up a new domestic violence charge. After the probation violation hearing, the client was reinstated to probation.
The client is alleged to have violated probation after allegedly absconding and dropping out of the treatment center. After a violation hearing, the client was reinstated to probation.
Client charged with sexual assault. Destroyed the complaining witness at the preliminary hearing. The state got very reasonable, and the matter was resolved with probation and no sex offender registration.
Client charged with sexual assault of a minor and lewdness. Destroyed the complaining witness at the preliminary hearing. Matter resolved to gross misdemeanor and probation, no sex offender registration.
Client charged with 5 counts total – 4 sexual assault with a minor under 14 and one kidnapping in the 1st degree. Facing life imprisonment. The client was found not guilty on all 5 counts.
Client charged with 4 counts total- 2 sexual with a minor under 14 and 2 counts of lewdness with a minor under 14. Facing life imprisonment. Three accusers in one trial. Client Found Not Guilty on all counts.
District Court. Client charged with Domestic Violence by Strangulation. Facing mandatory prison. Verdict = Not Guilty. Expert Witnesses.
Client charged with domestic battery. After the trial, Fount NOT Guilty.
Probation filed two separate violations. First violation for picking up new charges. After the violation hearing was reinstated. Probation file subsequent violation for absconding. After the violation hearing, reinstated to probation.
Client charged with battery. After the trial found NOT guilty!
District Court. Carson City, Nevada. The client was charged with various counts related to stabbing the complainant multiple times at the complainant’s house. Battery with the use of a deadly weapon and burglary. Verdict: hung jury. No conviction at the end of the trial.
I was charged with battery, causing substantial bodily harm. A Felony. My entire future was on the line, as well as my sanity and potential professional career. After a jury trial, I was found NOT GUILTY
The client was charged with abuse of an elderly or vulnerable person and was facing a lengthy jail sentence for the offense. Instead, thanks to LV Criminal Defense, the case was dismissed.
The client was charged with both ownership of a firearm by a prohibited person and discharging a weapon where a person might be endangered after discharging a weapon into an occupied vehicle. Although the client was facing jail time for two weapons charges, our legal team helped him get the case resolved with a sentence of probation only.
The client was charged with 21 different counts of theft, including grand theft of items valued at more than $3,500. Although jail time was a real possibility, both due to the number of charges and the value of the allegedly stolen items, LV Criminal Defense was able to get all 21 charges dismissed.
The client was charged with soliciting a prostitute and engaging in prostitution. While the client was facing not only jail time but also a record of a soliciting charge that could impact future opportunities, our legal team was able to get the charge pled down to disturbing the peace with no jail sentence.
The client was accused of possessing stolen merchandise and was facing a potential felony conviction. We provided pre-arrest representation and were able to resolve the case without arrest, so no record of the incident would affect his future.
The client was facing two drug charges related to the sale of a controlled substance. Instead of prison time, LV Criminal Defense was able to get the case resolved without out client facing only probation.
The client was charged with first-degree kidnapping of a minor, sex trafficking of a child under the age of 18, and child abuse or neglect. Thanks to our skillful representation, our client was sentenced to probation only instead of a lengthy prison sentence that could have resulted in decades of incarceration.
LV Criminal Defense has represented several defendants facing charges associated with battery; battery constituting domestic violence; battery involving strangulation; and battery involving serious bodily harm. Clients were facing the potential for lengthy prison sentences and, in some cases, felony convictions. Instead, cases were resolved with probation and reduced charges thanks to LV Criminal Defense.
The client was not only looking at the possibility of a lengthy prison sentence, but also being required to register as a sex offender. LV Criminal Defense was able to resolve the serious charges with probation only, and the defendant was kept off the sex offender registry because the charges were reduced to a non-registerable offense.
The client was facing felony charges and the potential for a lengthy jail sentence. Our legal team was able to get the charges reduced to petit larceny instead, and the client did not have to serve any time in jail.
A.T. faced federal charges of obstruction of justice in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (13-CR-10238). A.T. was also charged with conspiracy to obstruct justice. Both charges arose out of his connection with the alleged perpetrator of the Boston marathon bombing. The jury verdict was split, with half finding Mr. A.T. guilty and the other half finding him not guilty.
The client was charged with assault in the second degree in the Superior Court Criminal Term in Kings County, Brooklyn (2011KNO59827). Mr. Daykhin also faced charges of criminal contempt. The case proceeded to a trial by jury. Serving as lead counsel, we subpoenaed FBI agents who had interviewed complainants in the past and who were able to testify about prior inconsistent statements that were made. The Government argued that the state court judge did not have the jurisdiction to subpoena the FBI agents, resulting in negotiations with the government to either litigate in federal court or bring the agents to state court. The government agreed to permit the agent to testify, and the testimony was likely one of the deciding factors that resulted in a verdict or not guilty.
The client was charged with multiple criminal counts in a District Court in Carson City, Nevada (14 CR 00126 1B). The charges stemmed from the complainant’s accusations that the defendant had stabbed the complainant multiple times. The case proceeded to jury trial and ended with a hung jury.
The client was charged with multiple counts of assault and criminal contempt in a Nassau County, New York, Court. (2009NA020420) We served as lead counsel in the jury trial. The client was found not guilty on all criminal counts.
The client was charged with aggravated harassment and criminal contempt. We served as lead counsel in a jury trial, and the client was found not guilty of the charges.
The client was charged with domestic violence-related offenses in the New York State criminal court in Kings County, Brooklyn. After a jury trial, the client was acquitted of all counts.
The client was accused of offenses involving international slavery. We provided legal representation, and the client was sentenced to a short sentence of time served. (1:08-cr-00967-RPP)
The client faced three charges in a Kings County, Brooklyn, NY court, all arising from allegedly driving while impaired. Client was charged with driving while ability impaired; driving while intoxicated per se; and driving under the influence (VTL Sections 1192(1), 1192(2), 1192(3)). The case was resolved in a jury trial, and we served as lead counsel. We were able to successfully discredit the prosecutor’s expert witnesses who testified on an extrapolation theory. The client was acquitted of all criminal charges and was only found guilty of a violation (driving while impaired) rather than a crime.
The client was charged with driving while intoxicated per se and driving while intoxicated. The case was brought in Kings County criminal state court in Brooklyn, NY. Serving as the lead counsel, the case proceeded to the trial stage. We represented the client in both a Huntley hearing and a Dunaway hearing, and we cross-examined the officers involved in the arrest. Following the hearings and before jury selection, the prosecutor offered to charge the client with the violation of driving while impaired and to drop the criminal charges. The client was on supervised release from a federal case at the time and accepted the violation because a conviction for a crime could have resulted in imprisonment.
The client was accused of having approximately 20 pounds of illegal substances, including heroin and meth. We provided legal representation in the resulting drug crimes case. (3:13-cr-00048-MMD-WGC)
The client was accused of trafficking in bath salts and spice. We provided legal representation in the drug crimes case, and the client was sentenced to a short period of prison time in major variance of sentencing guidelines. (7:13-cr-00896-VB)
We provided legal representation to a client facing charges under controlled substances laws. The client had allegedly been found in possession of large quantities of marijuana. We were able to get all charges dropped.
The client was charged with various criminal counts under the Arms Export Control Act in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia. The charges against the client included Conspiracy to Violate the Arms Export Control Act (18 U.S.C. Section 371), as well as other offenses, including Conspiracy to Violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. Section 1705) and Conspiracy to launder money instruments (18 U.S.C. Section 1956(h)). The client pled guilty to three counts, and we served as lead counsel in a highly litigated two-day sentencing hearing. Numerous experts and witnesses were cross-examined, and the client received a favorable sentence.
The client was charged with weapons offenses in the Supreme Court Criminal Term of Kings County in Brooklyn, NY. (Indictment No. 2759-2010) Charges alleged that the client was in criminal possession of weapons, including 30 long arms and firearms. We represented the client during pre-trial hearings, including both a Huntley hearing and a Dunaway hearing. There were more than three years of litigation during which time the state had law enforcement officers testify that there was probable cause to stop the defendant and that the defendant’s statements were voluntary. Prior to trial, the state made a reasonable offer to allow the defendant to serve a sentence of 1 2/3 years. The client accepted the offer.
The client was accused of involvement in child pornography, including servicing payments for child pornography and providing access to illegal websites and content. The case was one of the largest child pornography cases in the history of the United States. (2:08-cr-00625-WHW)
The client faced federal charges for allegedly promoting prostitution of a minor. We represented the client and were able to negotiate a plea arrangement to a crime that did not have a mandatory minimum sentence. During the sentencing hearing, the judge granted the client a downward of sentencing guidelines.
The client was accused of involvement with a major monetary fraud scheme that caused millions of dollars in losses. The fraud was related to insurance companies, medical, and health clinics. The client received a non-custodial sentence and was put on probation, serving no jail time. (1:08-cr-00731-JGK)
The client was charged with theft in the New York State Criminal Court in Kings County, Brooklyn. The client was acquitted of the criminal charges.
We provided legal representation to clients who were accused of defrauding insurance companies of millions of dollars. The insurance fraud case was litigated, but settled favorably on behalf of our clients. (1:05-cv-05933-SJ-VVP)
Our clients were accused of allegedly defrauding insurance companies of millions of dollars of losses in a large insurance fraud case. We provided representation during litigation, and the case settled favorably on behalf of our clients. (1:04-cv-02609-NG-SMG).
The client was accused of involvement with a large conspiracy to commit identity theft. The client was awaiting sentence on the identity fraud charges when he allegedly reoffended. Notwithstanding the new offense, he was sentenced to a short term of jail time, varying significantly from the guidelines.
We provided legal representation in a Fatico hearing to determine loss amounts in a mortgage fraud case. The government alleged losses significantly higher than those preferred by the defendant. The federal judge sided with the defense and held that the amounts of loss were not as high as alleged by the government.
We provided legal representation to the client in a case alleging insurance fraud. The client was sentenced to probation instead of jail time. (05-cr-00186-HKS-28)
Our client was one of several defendants charged with insurance fraud. The client that we represented was the only one of the defendants who received a non-custodial sentence. (1:11-cr-00892-RMB-8)
The client was charged as part of a major federal fraud case involving credit card fraud in multiple federal districts. Estimated losses from the credit card fraud scheme allegedly exceeded $50,000,000. The client was sentenced to a relatively short period of imprisonment.
We provided legal representation for a client accused of taking bribes and kickbacks. The client worked for the United Nations at the time when he allegedly accepted bribes and received kickbacks when helping to get contracts through the procurement process. Our client was accused of taking kickbacks with a value of almost $1 million. The client received a non-custodial sentence.
The client was involved in a contested sentencing hearing related to the amount of loss in bank and wire fraud cases. The hearing occurred in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (1:11-cr-00068-RJS). We served as lead counsel for the client during a full Fatico Hearing. Expert witnesses were presented to testify on the value of the restitution and how losses should be calculated. We performed both direct exams of experts and cross-examinations. A satisfying resolution was reached on the issue of restitution.
The client was accused of wire fraud and mail fraud. The charges arose from the alleged theft of credit card numbers and the use of an unauthorized access device. There were large amounts of loss. The client received a short jail sentence lasting around three months. (1:08-cr-00105-CBA)
The client was accused of involvement with fraud schemes with an estimated $50,000,000 in losses. The client was charged with mail fraud and wire fraud. While his co-defendant received a sentence of more than 20 years in prison, our client received a relatively brief sentence of imprisonment. (08-cr-00160-SJF-AKT-2)
We provided legal representation to an alleged hacker from Russia in a high-profile criminal case. Our client was sentenced to time served.
The client was accused of violating supervised release requirements and charged in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (01-CR-1368-01). The court determined that a violation had, in fact, occurred. However, the court also found that the alleged violation was not as serious as the government had pleaded it was. The court told the government and defense counsel to negotiate and agree on an appropriate consequence for the minor violation. The client was imprisoned for a short period of time, and no longer required to remain under supervision on supervised release.
We served as lead counsel in a Huntley hearing in the New York Criminal Court in Richmond County, located in Staten Island. The hearing was to determine whether a defendant’s statements were made voluntarily. We presented defense witnesses, and the court ultimately determined that the defendant did not understand the Miranda rights and thus could not waive those rights. As a result, the defendant’s statements were considered involuntary, and the defendant was able to resolve the underlying criminal charges through a non-criminal disposition.
We served as lead counsel for Mr. A.L. in the United States Immigration Court in Manhattan. Immigration had placed a hold on Mr. A.L.’s release following a criminal trial because Mr. A.L. had numerous past criminal convictions. The government sought to remove Mr. A.L. in a removal proceeding. We successfully represented Mr. A.L., and he was granted asylum, released, and allowed to remain within the United States.
5 Star35 reviewsEstate litigation arose involving the probating of a will. We provided legal representation to the petitioner/executor in the estate litigation in Kings County, Brooklyn. The case progressed to a jury trial, and halfway through the trial, we were able to settle the case favorably.
We provided representation to clients in a case involving intellectual property rights and an alleged breach of contract. A favorable settlement was reached after litigation began.
Awards
Reviews
