702-623-6362 
Being arrested with a controlled substance does not necessarily mean you intended to sell it. Yet a quantity of drugs, several plastic bags, cash in your pocket, or messages on your phone may be enough for police to accuse you of something substantially more serious than personal possession.
Possession with intent to sell is a felony in Nevada, and a conviction can carry years in prison, significant fines, and consequences that extend well beyond the criminal case. The situation becomes more complicated when prosecutors allege an actual drug sale, a larger distribution operation, or drug trafficking.
Las Vegas criminal defense attorney Nick Wooldridge represents people accused of drug offenses throughout Clark County and Nevada. He examines the circumstances of the arrest, how police obtained their evidence, and whether the prosecution can actually establish the alleged purpose of sale.
The difference is important. Someone who has drugs for their own use could have a very different charge than someone who is being charged with having a drug inventory to sell. Police conclusions are not evidence, and not all cases that involve cash, packaging, or text messages will support the initial charge.
If you are accused of selling drugs or possessing methamphetamine, cocaine, fentanyl, marijuana, or another controlled substance with intent to distribute, contact LV Criminal Defense at 702-623-6362 to discuss your case before making decisions that may affect your defense.
On This Page
Nevada law prohibits possessing controlled substances for the purpose of selling them, even when no transaction has taken place.
Nick Wooldridge has a long track record of representing clients accused of serious federal and state crimes in Nevada.
The two principal statutes are:
The prosecution generally must establish that the defendant knowingly possessed the substance involved and intended it to be sold. An actual completed sale is not necessary for a possession-for-sale conviction.
There are multiple types of possession recognized by law. If an individual has drugs on their person, this can be used as evidence of either direct/actual possession. When drugs are located in a car, apartment, storage unit, or other type of shared living space; there may be charges brought against the individual based upon constructive/joint possession.
However, just because an individual was close to drugs does not mean they had possession of those drugs. Having access to a location does not create a presumption that an individual knew about the presence of drugs at that location nor did they exercise control over those drugs. Each case will depend on its own unique set of circumstances, particularly if multiple individuals had access to the same property.
The additional element that distinguishes this charge from simple possession of a controlled substance is the alleged purpose of sale. That element can become the central dispute in a criminal case.
When I initially met with Mr. Wooldridge, he took the opportunity to sit and go over my problem with me. He described details in my case which he found disturbing and explained why he I should have him on my side.
A defendant will seldom state his/her intent to sell drugs in the presence of law enforcement. Therefore, prosecutors often use circumstantial evidence; i.e., what can be inferred from the events surrounding a seizure.
Examples of such circumstantial evidence include: the quantity of drugs found; how each package was labeled/packaged; whether there were digital scales present; if any cash was found; if there were transaction records; if there was communication with suspected buyers; if surveillance observations were made; and/or if statements were made by witnesses.
A large quantity of a controlled substance may be used to support an allegation of distribution. Similarly, multiple small packages containing similar quantities may also be used to support an allegation of distribution. If both of these factors exist along with communications regarding price(s) and/or meeting(s), then prosecutors may argue that this demonstrates a commercial purpose.
Still, no single item automatically proves intent to sell.
Someone may possess a scale for legitimate purposes. Cash may come from employment or other lawful activities. A person with a substance use disorder may purchase drugs in quantities larger than expected for immediate consumption. And a message interpreted as a proposed drug transaction may have an entirely different meaning when the complete conversation is examined.
The location of an arrest can also be deceptive. Just because someone is arrested near a hotel, on Interstate 15, or at a home that is part of a drug investigation; this does not make them a seller based on what police think may have occurred in that area.
The strength of the prosecution’s case depends on how the evidence fits together and whether reasonable alternative explanations remain.
Yes. Possession for sale does not require proof that a buyer received drugs or paid money.
Officers may find multiple packages in a vehicle at a traffic stop and determine that these packages were being prepared for sale. Officers may also use information provided by a confidential informant, a surveillance operation, or messages found on a phone.
However, there is a significant difference between evidence used to support an arrest and evidence that is sufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. A possession for sale charge can still be challenged even if officers believe that their original investigation provided enough evidence to file the charge.
Terms such as drug distribution, possession with intent to distribute, drug dealing, and drug sales are often used interchangeably in everyday conversation. Nevada law distinguishes among the underlying offenses.
| Drug offense | Nevada law | What distinguishes the charge? |
|---|---|---|
| Simple drug possession | NRS 453.336 | Unlawful possession without an alleged purpose of sale |
| Possession with intent to sell | NRS 453.337 / 453.338 | Possession for the purpose of sale, without requiring a completed transaction |
| Sale or unlawful transfer of drugs | NRS 453.321 | Prohibited acts including selling, supplying, giving away, transporting, offering, or attempting specified acts |
| Drug trafficking | NRS 453.3385 / 453.3387 / 453.339 | Specified drug quantities can trigger trafficking charges even without proof of a completed sale |
The individual who is accused of providing drugs to another person can be prosecuted pursuant to NRS 453.321. NRS 453.321 is applicable to more than just transactions where money is exchanged; certain unauthorized transfers, offers, and/or attempts may also be covered by this statute.
Possession with intent to sell is different. It focuses on possessing a controlled substance for the purpose of sale before the proposed transaction occurs.
And drug trafficking involves a separate statutory framework under which the quantity and classification of a substance can create substantial exposure to prison time.
The difference is not merely technical. A first offense involving an actual sale of a Schedule I or II substance is generally a Category C felony under NRS 453.321, while a first offense of possession for sale under NRS 453.337 is generally a Category D felony, unless a more serious provision applies.
The exact words used in the criminal complaint are important because a general statement like “drug distribution” could refer to many different types of charges including: possession for sale, a transfer, a conspiracy, or trafficking based on quantity.
Understanding which statute actually applies is the starting point for an effective defense.
Possession for sale is a felony regardless of whether police claim the intended transaction involved a relatively small amount of drugs or a larger quantity.
The potential sentence depends on the controlled substance’s classification, applicable prior convictions, and whether other provisions impose a greater penalty.
| Controlled substance classification | First offense | Second offense | Third or subsequent offense |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule I or II — NRS 453.337 | Category D felony: 1–4 years | Category C felony: 1–5 years | Category B felony: 3–15 years |
| Schedule III, IV, or V — NRS 453.338 | Category D felony: 1–4 years | Category D felony: 1–4 years | Category C felony: 1–5 years |
These are the statutory maximums for each of the listed crimes; however, they do not represent what will be the actual sentence in any given case. In addition to these statutory maximums, if you have been convicted of a prior felony drug offense, then your classification could be increased which would result in an increased penalty.
For a first Schedule I or II possession-for-sale offense, the ordinary Category D felony provision permits an additional fine of up to $5,000. A Category C offense generally permits a fine of up to $10,000, while the third-or-subsequent Category B provision specifically authorizes a fine of up to $20,000.
For Schedule III through V substances, NRS 453.338 expressly permits a fine of up to $10,000 for a first or second offense, even though both are Category D felonies.
These penalties differ from those for an actual sale under NRS 453.321 and from the weight-based penalties established for trafficking.
Probation is a possibility; however, you cannot assume that you will qualify.
Typically, a first-offense conviction for NRS 453.337 does not have the same statutory probation limitations as some repeat offenses. In enhanced Schedule I or II offenses, the statute prohibits probation unless there are mitigating factors that would allow for probation. There are also specific restrictions on certain substances such as flunitrazepam and gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
NRS 453.338 contains its own restrictions for defendants sentenced under its enhanced repeat-offense provision.
The outcome also depends on a defendant’s record, the circumstances of the offense, other pending charges, and applicable Nevada sentencing rules.
An attorney can evaluate whether the case offers a realistic path toward probation, a reduction in charges, another lawful sentencing alternative, or a challenge to the prosecution’s case.
Sometimes. One possible defense objective is persuading prosecutors that the evidence supports unlawful possession but not possession for the purpose of sale.
That distinction can change the statutory penalties substantially, particularly for lower-quantity first or second offenses.
An example is that some first-time or second-time offenders who commit crimes with less than 14 grams of schedule I or II drugs can be treated as category E felonies and receive deferred judgments if they meet specific requirements (NRS 453.336).
However, simple possession is not always a minor offense. Nevada also establishes more serious weight-based categories for possession without intent to sell.
A reduction is therefore not automatically available or favorable in every situation. Nick can examine the alleged weight, the substance’s classification, prior convictions, and other circumstances before discussing whether a plea negotiation, treatment-related option, or contested defense offers a better course.
An effective defense is based on the evidence that the prosecutor has; not on what is written in the arrest report.
Several issues may determine whether the government can establish possession for sale.
The prosecution may have evidence that a defendant possessed drugs but comparatively little evidence of a commercial purpose.
If police rely primarily on packaging, quantity, cash, or possession of a scale, the defense can examine whether these circumstances support the conclusion being drawn.
The analysis needs to determine the exact amount of contraband that was confiscated; how the contraband was packaged; who had access to the contraband; if there were any transactions witnessed; and if investigators were able to obtain reliable information about potential customers or future sales.
A defense lawyer does not have to prove a different explanation in every case. The prosecution retains the burden of proving the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.
Many Las Vegas drug cases begin with a vehicle stop, residential search, hotel encounter, or search conducted after an arrest.
The Fourth Amendment places restrictions on government searches and seizures. Depending on the circumstances, an attorney may investigate whether officers had a lawful basis to stop a vehicle, obtain a warrant, search a particular location, or expand the scope of an encounter.
Questions may arise about consent, probable cause, warrant validity, or whether an exception to the warrant requirement applied.
When evidence was obtained in violation of constitutional protections, the defense may have grounds to request its suppression. A successful suppression motion can substantially affect the case, although exclusion is not automatic and depends on the facts and applicable law.
Sometimes possession for sale cases take place in apartments shared by multiple individuals; vehicles borrowed from others; hotel rooms; or storage units that can be accessed by more than one individual.
An individual may have knowledge of who owns a vehicle but not of what is hidden within the vehicle. Likewise, finding drugs in a common area does not automatically mean each person occupying that area had control over those drugs.
The defense will evaluate ownership, access, fingerprints (if applicable), communications, witness testimony, and all other evidence that connects the defendant to the specific drug(s). Do not confuse presence, proximity, and/or association as proof of knowing possession.
The government must establish the nature of the substance involved in the offense.
Laboratory results, evidence handling, chain-of-custody records, and the methods used to identify or weigh a substance may require scrutiny.
This is particularly important in cases involving mixtures, multiple packages, suspected fentanyl, or allegations that a quantity triggers a more serious statutory offense.
Where a legitimate scientific dispute exists, independent review or expert testimony may help identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s evidence.
Police may use price, quantity, delivery location, or meeting related text messages as proof of drug sales. an attorney may be able to determine if investigators properly identified the individuals involved, if the messages were kept in their original context, and if the prosecution will be able to prove who had control over a particular device or account.
Similar issues occur when using confidential informants and/or undercover operations. Witness credibility, possible rewards for the witness, identification techniques used by the witness, quality of recordings, and inconsistencies within the witnesses account may all be relevant.
In some cases, the key question is not whether a communication exists, but whether the interpretation being offered is supported by reliable evidence.
A controlled buy may involve police arranging for an informant or undercover officer to purchase a substance from a suspected seller.
These cases may depend on surveillance recordings, identification, informant credibility, pre- and post-operation searches, and procedures used to maintain the evidence.
If officers did not continuously observe the transaction, failed to document important details, or relied on conflicting accounts, the defense may have grounds to question the reliability of the allegation.
The presence of an alleged controlled buy does not eliminate the prosecution’s obligation to prove the charged offense.
The substance involved affects not only potential punishment but also the kinds of evidence that may become important to the defense. A methamphetamine case, for example, may raise different issues from a marijuana accusation involving lawful personal possession.
Methamphetamine (meth), which is also referred to as crystal meth, is typically considered a Schedule II controlled substance in the state of Nevada. If someone is charged with possessing methamphetamine for sale, they will likely be prosecuted pursuant to NRS 453.337.
Officers will typically consider many things when determining if someone is in possession of methamphetamine. These include: the amount of methamphetamine located; how the methamphetamine was wrapped; whether there were any scales found; whether there were any messages about selling; and the general circumstances surrounding the alleged possession.
Methamphetamine cases can also stem from searches of homes, cars, or other areas being investigated for possible distribution. When multiple individuals have access to the same area, determining who actually knew about and/or had control over the methamphetamine can be difficult.
Additionally, methamphetamine cases may include other charges related to manufacturing, transporting, or conspiring to distribute methamphetamine; however, these types of charges must be evaluated independently and cannot simply be assumed as a result of possessing methamphetamine.
The difference between evidence of personal use and evidence of intended sales is crucial when evaluating possession-for-sale charges. When large amounts of methamphetamine are involved, Nevada’s trafficking laws may provide additional penalties that make having laboratory testing performed on the methamphetamine and accurately weighing it extremely important.
Fentanyl cases can present complicated legal and forensic questions, especially when the alleged substance is contained in counterfeit tablets, powder, or a mixture with other drugs.
A defendant can be charged with possession of fentanyl for distribution, regardless of whether a completed sale was witnessed by police. Police may use the way tablets were packaged, communication regarding quantity, and/or evidence found during a search to support this charge.
It is essential to determine both what the substance is and its composition. While investigators may initially believe a substance is fentanyl based on their observation in the field or through testing; however, the reliability and admissibility of that evidence must be determined.
In addition to NRS 453.3387 (Nevada’s Fentanyl Trafficking Statute), which addresses illicitly manufactured fentanyl, certain derivatives, and mixtures containing them; Nevada also has a separate fentanyl trafficking statute. The first specified trafficking threshold under NRS 453.3387 is 28 grams, and there are additional provisions for larger quantities.
The defense has to distinguish between a regular possession for sale case and a case where the defendant is being charged with violating the specific statutes of trafficking. Laboratory testing, knowledge, possession, and the specific charges are especially important in fentanyl cases.
Cocaine is generally considered a Schedule II controlled substance in Nevada, and the illegal possession of cocaine with the intent to sell may lead to felony charges under NRS 453.337. Police may charge an individual with selling cocaine if they recover multiple separate packages of the drug; if they find what appear to be record of transactions; or if they observe a suspect at a location where it is suspected that cocaine is being distributed.
Similar evidence may be used in crack cocaine cases; however, the physical form of the substance may impact laboratory testing and the factual circumstances of the case. One major issue is whether police have evidence of actual distribution or if they are interpreting the possession of the drug and the surrounding circumstances as evidence of an intended sale.
Multiple packages may support the prosecution’s theory; however, simply having multiple packages does not meet every requirement of the charge. The defendant’s relationship with the drugs; the reason for being in possession of the drugs; and the reliability of witness testimony can all be challenged.
Additionally, when cocaine quantities create the potential for trafficking penalties, the statutory weight must be calculated separately.
Heroin is a Schedule I controlled substance, and alleged possession for sale can result in felony prosecution under NRS 453.337.
Investigators working on heroin or other opioid cases can search homes, suspected transaction locations, vehicles, and/or electronic communications. There are times when investigators find more than one type of controlled substance which will allow prosecutors to bring multiple charges against the individual.
The defense may need to determine whether the government has reliable evidence connecting the defendant to each substance and whether the alleged circumstances demonstrate an intended sale.
Laboratory testing is especially important where the substance’s identity is uncertain or officers suspect a mixture containing fentanyl.
Opioid-related cases may result in additional charges for either the illegal sale of opioids or serious injury caused by opioids. However, these types of charges are distinct from the primary charge of possession for sale, and each type of charge must be evaluated based on its own unique requirements.
Marijuana is treated differently than many other controlled substances in Nevada, as there are some adult use possessions and transfers allowed by Nevada law.
Adults who are 21 years old and older can generally have up to 2.5 ounces of usable marijuana (or one quarter ounce of concentrated marijuana) at any given time, as long as they meet all of the statutory requirements.
In addition, Nevada allows for some very limited non-commercial transfers between two qualifying adults; however, these transfers must be done without payment and must meet all of the requirements.
However, legalization of personal cannabis use does not authorize operating an unlicensed cannabis business or selling marijuana outside the state’s regulatory framework.
The investigation of marijuana distribution must be conducted with great care due to the different types of activities that may have occurred. There is a distinction between possessing marijuana for legitimate personal use; transferring marijuana legally without receiving any compensation; and selling marijuana illegally.
The applicable charges and penalties depend on the circumstances, including the quantity, the alleged transaction, and the relevant cannabis and controlled-substance provisions.
Large marijuana quantities may also implicate NRS 453.339, which establishes trafficking penalties beginning at 50 pounds of marijuana or one pound of concentrated cannabis.
For additional details, see our guide to possession of marijuana with intent to sell.
Prescription medications can also become the subject of possession-for-sale allegations.
Examples include oxycodone and certain other opioid medications, as well as sedatives such as Xanax (alprazolam). The precise drug schedule affects whether NRS 453.337 or NRS 453.338 applies.
A valid prescription may explain lawful possession of medication, but it does not ordinarily authorize a patient to engage in unauthorized commercial distribution.
The police can look into whether a person has sold medications they were given; if they have passed on prescription pills to someone else; and/or if they had enough of the pill to suggest it was going to be resold.
To do this properly, you will need to examine pharmacy records, prescribing history, the defendant’s right to have and/or distribute the medication, and what evidence there is of an attempted sale.
If the allegations come from text messages or financial records, these should be looked at within the context of everything else. Just because someone has the legal right to obtain medication does not mean they intend to sell it illegally.
A person does not have to be caught completing a drug sale to face trafficking charges in Nevada.
For certain controlled substances, trafficking statutes focus on specified quantities that a defendant knowingly or intentionally possesses, sells, manufactures, delivers, or brings into the state.
Under NRS 453.3385, the general trafficking threshold for covered Schedule I and II substances, excluding marijuana and subject to the statute’s specific terms, begins at 100 grams.
Fentanyl has its own provision under NRS 453.3387, with specified trafficking categories beginning at 28 grams.
Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 453.339 has established separate limits for marijuana and concentrated cannabis; specifically, 50 pounds of marijuana or one pound of concentrated cannabis for the first trafficking category.
Therefore, these examples demonstrate how drug weight and intent to sell are two distinct issues. While a relatively small amount of drugs could be sufficient to establish a possession-for-sale charge based upon the evidence presented, an amount that meets a statutory trafficking limit will result in trafficking liability regardless of whether or not a sale occurred.
In cases involving mixtures, the statutory approach to weight and laboratory evidence can become especially important.
Our separate Las Vegas drug trafficking defense guide explains those charges and penalties in more detail.
A drug arrest may create financial problems before the criminal case is resolved.
Police sometimes seize cash, vehicles, or other property that they believe is connected to an unlawful drug transaction.
Under NRS 453.301, cash exceeding $300 found in the possession of a person arrested under NRS 453.337 or NRS 453.338 is subject to a rebuttable statutory presumption concerning its connection to a drug exchange for forfeiture purposes.
That provision does not automatically establish guilt or prove intent to sell. Forfeiture and criminal conviction are distinct legal matters.
If money or other property has been seized, the circumstances of the seizure and the procedures for challenging forfeiture may require attention alongside the criminal defense.
Employment records, business records, financial documentation, and other evidence may be relevant to explaining the lawful origin of disputed funds.
An arrest can take place as a result of a traffic stop; execution of a search warrant; an undercover operation; or at the conclusion of a transaction. Prosecutors may also choose to bring charges after a lengthy investigation instead of immediately following the incident.
Once charges are filed, a defendant may face an initial court appearance, bail or release conditions, and subsequent proceedings appropriate to the level and nature of the offense.
Felony cases can involve a preliminary hearing or grand jury proceedings, discovery, pretrial motions, plea negotiations, and potentially a trial.
The progression of the case will be determined by how the charges were filed, where they are filed, and the decisions that are made during the course of the proceedings.
Preparation for a defense at an early stage can include reviewing police reports, obtaining copies of any available surveillance recordings, reviewing search warrant material, identifying possible witnesses, and determining if digital or scientific evidence requires independent attention.
If you have been arrested, it is generally prudent not to discuss the allegations with investigators without legal counsel. Statements made in an attempt to explain the situation may later be introduced as evidence.
Similarly, avoid deleting messages, discarding records, or contacting witnesses in a way that could be interpreted as interference with an investigation.
Nick Wooldridge can explain the charges, court procedures, and available options after reviewing the relevant circumstances.
Possession-for-sale cases can turn on details that are easy to overlook in an initial police report.
The difference between an unlawful possession allegation and a claim of intended distribution may involve just a few pieces of circumstantial evidence. The defense must determine what those items actually demonstrate and whether they are admissible and reliable.
Nick Wooldridge has been licensed to practice law in Nevada since 2004 and represents defendants facing state and federal criminal charges. His approach begins with examining the allegations, reviewing the evidence, and identifying legal and factual issues that may affect the case.
The primary objective of LV Criminal Defense is to provide its clients with an understanding of the potential ramifications of the charges they face and the options that exist for addressing those charges. This may include challenging the prosecution’s evidence; filing appropriate pre-trial motions; seeking a resolution through negotiations; or preparing to present a defense against the allegations at trial.
In addition to the August 2024 case, LV Criminal Defense has also published results for cases involving clients who have been charged with felonies related to possession for sale of Schedule I and II controlled substances.
For example, A.P. was originally charged as a felon, however, his/her charge was eventually reduced to a misdemeanor. In addition, in a separate published matter from September 2023, the client was charged with multiple offenses such as; drug trafficking, conspiracy, and possession with intent to sell. The resolution of this matter was through probation.
You can review additional matters on our criminal case results page.
Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Each case depends on its own facts, evidence, charges, and applicable law.
Not every drug case should be defended in the same way.
A defendant accused after a questionable traffic stop may have substantial constitutional issues. Someone whose name appears in messages recovered from another person’s phone may face a dispute about identification or context. A person charged because drugs were found in a shared residence may contest knowledge and control.
Other cases may call for examining laboratory findings, negotiating a reduction, or preparing for trial.
Nick considers these issues in light of the client’s personal circumstances and objectives, rather than assuming that every drug charge should follow the same path toward a plea agreement.
Yes. All unlawful possessions for sale under NRS 453.337 or NRS 453.338 are classified as felonies. The classification and potential penalty will be determined by the substance and any prior convictions. There are separate provisions that can result in increased penalties.
Nevada’s principal possession-for-sale statutes do not establish a universal minimum amount that must be possessed before a charge can be filed.
Prosecutors can seek to establish intent through the surrounding evidence, including packaging, communications, alleged transactions, and other circumstances.
Quantity becomes especially important when separate weight-based possession or trafficking provisions are involved.
Yes, however, the legal basis will determine how this is handled. Possession for sale does not require a completed transaction. Also, NRS 453.321 includes prohibited offers and attempts in addition to completed actions.
The prosecution must still prove the specific elements of the offense charged.
No. Scales and packaging can be used as circumstantial evidence, but neither automatically establishes an intention to sell drugs.
Their significance depends on the complete circumstances, including how the items were used, where they were found, and what other reliable evidence exists.
While these terms are frequently used interchangeably, the specific statutory offense is what counts. Possession for sale in Nevada is primarily addressed by NRS 453.337 and 453.338.
Distribution, transfers, offers, or attempts to distribute may be covered under NRS 453.321; however, federal charges may be based upon other statutes and elements.
Yes, possibly. Under the appropriate possession-for-sale statute(s), a first-time offense can be considered for probation or other options available by law.
However, the outcome depends on the charge, circumstances, criminal history, and applicable sentencing restrictions. No particular sentence can be guaranteed.
The prosecution must establish the defendant’s connection to the controlled substance and the elements of the charged offense.
The fact that drugs were discovered in a vehicle or residence someone occupied does not automatically establish knowing possession. Shared access, knowledge, control, and other evidence can become important disputed issues.
Yes, a dismissal is possible; however, whether or not this occurs will depend upon the facts of each individual case. A charge can be dismissed if there is insufficient legal evidence to support the charge; if key evidence is suppressed; or if other procedural or factual issues exist that would make it difficult for prosecutors to proceed with the case.
At times, negotiations can result in a lesser charge being brought against an individual instead of having the charges completely dismissed.
Yes. While Nevada allows some adult use of cannabis and transfers of that cannabis; however, there are no unrestricted commercial sales of cannabis allowed.
Whether or not the conduct falls under Nevada’s cannabis exemptions, if an illegal sale was alleged, and how much was involved will determine the legal outcome.
Yes, it can. There are many types of controlled substance convictions, especially those related to illegal sale or distribution, which could result in serious immigration issues.
Noncitizens should obtain advice that considers both Nevada criminal law and federal immigration law before accepting a plea. A resolution that appears favorable for state sentencing purposes may still create immigration problems.
Being accused of possessing drugs for sale does not mean the prosecution can prove the accusation.
The evidence may raise legitimate questions about possession, intent, police procedures, laboratory findings, witness reliability, or the actual offense involved. The earlier those issues are identified, the better informed your decisions can be.
Whether you are facing allegations involving methamphetamine, cocaine, fentanyl, prescription medication, marijuana, or another substance, Nick Wooldridge can evaluate the charges and explain the defense options available under Nevada law.
LV Criminal Defense represents clients in Las Vegas, Henderson, North Las Vegas, and throughout Clark County, as well as in other Nevada jurisdictions.
Call 702-623-6362 or request a confidential consultation to discuss your case.
